Part 3. . Who Do You Think You Really Are?" When Technology and Genealogy Collide
The
Ancestors of Henry Irvin DeGraw
How
Modern Science Changed the Ancestral Position
of
the DeGraw Family of America
And
the lives of their Descendants in America and Australia
"Who Do You Think You Really Are?"
When
Technology and Genealogy Collide
Part
3
After researching and then compiling Henry DeGraw's family, using the memories of Almon DeGraw, and amazing thing happened.
Randy DeGraw decided to do something with his DNA results, so they were loaded and as an example, compared with mine. Of all things we shared DNA. From that point, the goal was to find the common ancestor, who had to have been born in England.
Background
The discovery of ancestral links
to the family of King William the Conqueror, began with the finding that one of
the DeGraw great grandmothers was the illegitimate daughter of Sir Rich!
In the days when King Henry VIII
was picking and choosing bed mates at random, he took advantage of his
laundress. A child was born, her brother also took advantage of some poor
English girl, and Alice Rich was the result.
Alice, is one of the reasons that the family of Randy and myself were
connected.
Well we thought it was, until
another co-incidence occurred.
Randy, Maree and myself had all
had our DNA processed. None of us had
any idea what to do with the results.
So
initially we did nothing.
My results were overwhelming, to
say the least, including the fact that my DNA revealed my heritage to be
Western Europe.
Maree's was a little better, she
matched on the Western Europe, German region, and fairly high on the English
line. That was quite predictable, as all
her family stories had been researched, written and shared.
My own family had been
researched, website published, books written on every ancestor from over a
thousand years ago.
Well perhaps not so, because my
DNA did not show any Chinese backgrounds, and my 3rd great grandfather was
Chinese, or so I thought.
Instead I was matching so
strongly with French Canadians, thousands of them.
That was something that became
nothing short of a very steep learning experience.
Went on with our daily lives, and
Maree and Randy decided to come for a visit, and to make a start on his Family
puzzles.
Sitting in front of my computer,
Randy could see his lineage unfolding.
It is quite exciting to see, all these ancestors and to learn where they
came from.
We are able to go right back into
England, with some, and then we learnt that he was from Belgium.
Here began another history lesson
in the making.
So the research began. My online tree grew expediently. It didn't take long for my head to spin with
all the snippets we found, and there was only one thing to do with them, begin
a story.
Changing Perceptions
After extensive research to find
my brother-in-laws ancestors, a connection was found. We shared the same 12th great
grandparents. How exciting was that? Those links were not to difficult to
find. In that same link though, his
lineage and mine differed. the further back the research went.
Back 950 years or more, to the
Kings and Queens of France. Randy's
Ethnicity estimate told a bit of a different story to mine, so no doubt those
links may be found in some small portion of his DNA but so would half the
population.
According to Randy's DNA
results, he is more Scottish than myself, and my father was a Scot!
When Scientific
Technology meets Genealogy
"Going back
into my deep history, the first thing I discover is that my basic mitochondrial
DNA is the same as in every other human on Earth, as we’re all
descended from one woman, known as Mitochondrial Eve, who
lived in Africa about 180,000 years ago. For me, this is a truly mind-blowing
idea – that if it were possible to trace the family tree of every person in the
world back 180,000 years (a blink of the eye in terms of the Earth’s history)
we would come to a point where we are all siblings. No wonder that spiritual
ideas of brother- and sisterhood have such deep resonance for humanity."
The Science of Interpreting DNA
is probably very easy for those dedicated scientists who solve hundreds of
crimes by the process.
But those connections take a long
time to prove. When King Richard III was
dug up from the carpark, it was known who he was, but it had to be proven. It took a long time to find some direct
descendants from the maternal line.
Just how successful would a
$99.00 DNA test really be? Would it be
able to solve any jigsaw puzzles, or would it make more. In my case, it made more, and left me in
bewilderment for weeks.
Those new puzzles became
challenges, and challenges need to be solved, or in my mind they do.
In the end, they were.
For me, my DNA results were
rather puzzling. First it related to my
ethnicity.
What a mystery that became. I
thought I was English, well established English, but my DNA indicated 62%
Western Europe, 24% English and 14% Scottish.
Time to apply logic. Then it
clicked, all those French who joined King William in 1066, crossed the channel
and fought a battle, only ever married into families of their same
background. They married into almost
every Scottish clan as well. It was not
until the late 1600's that there was ever an intermarriage that was out of the
class and social structure, mistresses excepted.
Then the next very confusing
part, was that I matched over 2000 Arcadian French Canadians.
How could that be possible? There are countless advertisements showing
how simple it is.
Just click a button and the whole
new world is waiting. But it doesn't
really work like that.
In some respects, DNA is a
marketing exercise. In reality it is a huge learning experience, take a swab,
send away the results and sit back and miraculously someone will work out that
you are their long lost cousins, or worse.
To learn who those people were,
is still reliant on a paper trail, and good research. In my case, my results indicated thousands of
French Canadians shared my DNA.
There were all the names of
different French people, not one that I recognised.
Then it becomes a bit of a wild
goose chase, hoping that someone who matches, will answer an email, so you can
compare notes, so to speak.
After some help from some DNA
sites, one person finally contacted me, and we set about to find a common
name. He had a Morrison in his records,
and so did I. My great grandparents.
The Morrison family lived in
Scotland had a family, one of their sons left Scotland in 1783, to settle in
Canada. Then his 6 children, my
cousins, all married French Canadians.
Another of their sons, my great
grandparents remained in Glasgow.
Within my Scottish family, there a links back to King
James and before. So there was the
answer.
But not quite, cause someone else
maybe 3.5 generations ago, got quite close to another descendant of these
cousins. The who will remain
unknown!
But being able to come to terms
with the French Canadian puzzle, gave me a little confidence.
Unravelling the family
tree branches and adding the research has been very enjoyable, hard work but
rewarding. I have been completely
overwhelmed that I have been able to discover so much about my ancestors.
But when Randy was trying
to fathom just what to do with his DNA results, I helped him to load it onto
the matching site. "It will take a
while, but I will check it in the morning, I said".
When you load your DNA
results, you are given a number. That stays with your profile. Then by following the links you can find just
how many people you share a relative with, people all over the world.
To test Randy's number,
and to show him how he could compare a number kit with another, I decided to just
try our own numbers.
You could have knocked me
down with a feather, to find that the report on my screen showed we matched!
When they were here, they could
see what could be done, but had no idea how to go about the process. One night, via a few telephone and messenger
connections, I helped Randy load his results.
What would be the chances of one
American, born in Michigan, matching with an Australian born in
Queensland. Statisticians might like to
work out the arithmetic, it is not a strong point of mine any more.
325 million is the population of
America, 22 million in Australia, and two people related by marriage share the
same common grandparents, and that match is around 6.3 generations ago.
It did not seem possible.
DNA does not lie. That is evident. From that point, all the research was wasted
unless this one person could be identified.
One in how many? Surely a needle
in a haystack.
Not only that but our
matches were quite close. Six
generations. That was something I really
did not understand, as geographically, he was born in America, from American
Heritage, I was born in Australia from English and Scottish Heritage.
Initially I just thought it was all a bit
suss! Until I asked for some help, and
one person told me it will be a six generation mixing with your fifth
generation. From that moment on, the
focus on researching Randy's family, became a determined effort to find exactly
where we matched and with whom.
Over the years, my
understanding of my ancestors was pretty good.
The options for anyone going to America were very slim.
In order to find this link, Randy's family tree had to be researched, because in my view the link had to be in England, and prior to 1600, but with whom? Compiling his tree was so very difficult, due to so much misinformation relative to different ancestors. It took a long time, and was quite frustrating.
I almost gave up, then there it was! A name that I had in my family.
So the link was found,
and it was again another complete surprise, and for Randy another door opened
into shared grandparents that he had no idea existed. In 1597, my great uncle, Sir William Herrick
married and had a family. His eldest son
was named Henry. It was known that Henry
went to America, and that there were thousands of Herrick descendants in
America.
In fact recently an
elderly cousin visited Leicester where they lived, and while examining their
grave, was confronted by some American cousins, who were most upset to think
that their ancestors had descendants in Australia. "Well we might be from the antipodes,
but we are not stupid, and still shackled in convict chains", he was
naturally, quite upset with their treatment.
But for all the
researchers and for all the books written over the years, about these twelfth
great grandparents, none understood the family structure, as it was before
Henry was virtually expelled from the family.
There had to be a reason why he left, that reason just had to be found!
Applying Logic
Nothing would have prepared Randy
DeGraw or myself than to see this matching record of a comparison of our
DNA. There are others who can define
just all the numbers, but nothing would be worthwhile, unless there was some
corresponding Family Research to compare.
Randy had not compiled his Family
Tree which would have made the search impossible.
Finding Common Links
Sara Burr Derby's research had
been very difficult, due to the copious errors which others who are researching
their family trees, have used when establishing Family Lineage.
So many seem to just want to find
a link with some British Royalty, or Noble family, without taking the time to
really research to see if that John
Rogers, for example, is in fact, the one from that place. Some people have ancestors born in America,
years before it was even settled!
Every one of these hints,
suggestions, whatever name they have, had to be checked, but not only were
there so many errors, but the so were many "official" source records.
In the case of Sara Derby, there
was a mistake from many about her father.
All the previous research had to be redone.
It was while this was happening
that something caught my eye. An unusual
ladies' name, and the surname of my 12th great grandparents.
To think that was an ecstatic
moment, is correct. Fancy finding the
link, now how to prove that it has followed through to Randy's family.
While Almon DeGraw was unaware of
the names of his great grandparents, they were an interesting group of
people.
Their ancestor were all among the
first settlers in America, that fact would no doubt have been a great surprise
for the Randy's parents and their siblings.
The Great Grandparents were
·
William
DeGraw and Loorina Loomas Paternal
·
Chauncy
Derby and Sarah Burr Maternal
Neither of those persons names
was familiar to me, and were not anyone previously researched.
Then for some unusual
reason, some different research emerged
about Chauncey Derby, and foolishly I started out wasting two days of research,
trying to reorganise and re-establish my original theories, believing I was
incorrect.
One lesson learnt, stick to
your own factual evidence.
But if this had not happened, if
by some chance there was mention of a woman named Bethiah, an unusual name, and one who was in Randy's
lineage, and if by chance, I had not decided to double check every Bethiah
lady, I would never have known that one such Bethiah Conant married a Jonathan
Herrick.
Unbelievably, here was the link
that glued our 6th generations together.
My Herrick family and Randy's Conant family married, but then there was
a relationship closer than that.
But firstly, the Herrick family
are very well known, for many different reasons. Probably the most significant is that they
owned the land that King Richard III was buried on. It is called Grey Friers.
Then within the Leicester
Cathedral in Leicestershire in England, there is a chapel, called St
Katherine's Chapel. It is the burial
chapel for the Herricks.
Now removed from the carpark that
was built over their land, King Richard joins them again, as his tomb is
outside their family crypt.
And if you thought that the
researchers were all that clever, finding just where the body was, well don't
let a good story get into the way of the truth.
You see Randy's great grandfather Henry
Herrick, went to Oxford, with his siblings, one of their masters was
Christopher Wren.
The father of the famous Sir Christophe
Wren. He was friends with our
grandparents, and they had a marker on their land which said "Here lyth
the last King of England."
Mr Wren wrote it all in his
diary, exactly where the grave was. That
diary, along with the Herrick papers has been digitised by Oxford University.
Any wonder there was no reply
when an email was sent to the "finder".
The Paternal Ancestors
The following people are paternal
ancestors of the DeGraw Family from Michigan.
As yet, Randy's mothers family has not been researched, other to know
when the first of the French family arrived in America, and where they lived in
England. From the results of the
research into the first century of residents in America, it is certain that the
two families are likely to share one great grandparent or relative.
Parents
Henry
Ernest DeGraw 1875
-1924
Wildelmina
Dorothy Portrafka 1895 -
1945
Grandparents
4
people
George
Emmet DeGraw 1841 -
1924
Sarah
Burr Derby 1841
- 1926
Gustav
Ernest Postrafka 1873
- 1934
Ernestine
Jasnof 1865
- 1945
Great
Grandparents 8people
William
DeGraw 1812
-1897
Loorina
Loomis 1815
-1902
Chauncy
Derby 1800 - 1865
Sarah
Burr 1814
Friedrich
Postrafka 1843-
1915
Dorothea
Plitt 1849
- 1895
Ludwig
Jasnof 1820
2G
Grandparents 16 people
Isaac
DeGraw 1759
- 1837
Mehitable
Miller 1793
- 1869
Thomas
Loomis 1771
- 1776
Irene
Chubb 1776
-1856
David Derby 1775
-1857
Sarah Abbott 1781
- 1865
Capt
Nathaniel Derby 1746
-1814
Jemima
Skinner 1759
-1812
Chauncey
Derby 1800
-1865
Samantha
Derby 1799
-1855
Francis
Karner 1805
-1841
Sythene
Knapp 1802
-1841
Gottfreid
Postrafka
Katherine
Morty
3rd Generation 32 Great
grandparents Around this point the different families
become interwoven
Johannes DeGraw 1753
-1830
Leah deVries 1756
-1849
Capt Michael Loomis 1741
-1793
Mary Karner 1741
-1820
Gideon Chubb 1750
-1815
Ann Coates 1756
-
David Derby 1750
Bethia Clark 1747
- 1845
Captain John Abbott 1748
- 1835
Susannah Meacham 1756
- 1833
Timothy Baker 1749
- 1816
Prudence Brooks 1750
- 1816
Felix Carner
1771 - 1821
Elizabeth Goldberg 1772
- 1855
Edward Knapp 1763
- 1821
Esther 1776
- 1853
4th Generation 64
Great grandparents
Johannes DeGraw ` 1716
-1765
Racheael von Hoorn 1723
- 1765
Johannes de Vries 1719
- 1802
Trynje Gerow 1728
- 1773
Josiah Loomis 1709
-1800
Abigail Bacon 1712
-1775
Andrew Karner 1702
-1781
Anna Stuber 1701
-1762
Gideon Chubb 1713
Phebe White 1710
- 1773
Samuel Derby 1710
- 1795
Mary Salisbury 1728
- 1778
Joseph Skinner
1733
Ruth Strong
1735
Capt John Abbott 1724
-1814
Sarah Baker 1721
-1777
Isaac Meacham 1716
Lydia Blanchard 1726
-1762
Aaron Baker 1726
-1802
Jemima Clark
1728 - 1845
James Brooks 1723 -1801
Elizabeth Bathrick 1724
-1793
Daniel Knapp
1741 - 1778
Hannah Lyon 1744
5th Generation 132
Great grandparents
Wilhelm de Greau 1676
Leuntie Machielse 1676
Cornelius van Hoorn 1671
- 1733
Jaquemina de Marets 1686
-1728
Johannes deVries 1686
- 1740
Marytie Becker 1683
- 1750
Benjain Giraud 1707
- 1797
Annetje Claesen
1698 -1733
Daniel Loomis 1657
- 1740
Mary Ellsworth 1660
- 1713
Capt Andrew Bacon 1666
- 1723
Mettabell Whitmore 1669
- 1732
Johannes Karner 1660
- 1717
Magdelena Fressler 1661
- 1745
Johanne Stuber 1672
-
Anna Mann
1678 -
Samuel Chubb 1687
Joan Walker 1690
Samuel Derby 1689
-1740
Mary Bryant 1685
- 1752
Nathanial Jones 1674
- 1745
Mary Redditt 1675
- 1749
Joseph Skinner 1703
Ezra Strong 1701
- 1785
Abigail Calvely 1714
- 1787
John Abbot 1701
- 1793
Elizabeth Phipps 1701
- 1782
Joseph Baker 1678
- 1740
Miriam Hurlbut 1683
- 1771
Captain John Baker 1679
- 1762
Rebecca Clark 1687
- 1774
Increase Clark 1684
- 1775
Mary Sheldon 1690
- 1767
Joseph Brooks 1670
- 1746
Rebecca Blodgett 1689
- 1768
John Bathridck 1702
- 1769
Mary Boyce 1701
- 1726
Daniel Knapp 1696
- 1722
Sarah Wilde
1709 -1797
Edward Lyon 1710
-1773
Rebecca Boyden 1716
- 1776
6th Generation 256
Great grandparents
Pieter De Graeu 1645
Cornelius Van Hoorn 1653
- 1729
Anna Wessels 1653
- 1702
Samuel Desmarets 1656
-1728
Maria Simone de Ruine 1662
- 1708
Johannes deVries 1647
- 1708
Adriaenjke Volkertzen 1650
- 1698
Jan Claesen 1669
- 1705
Treyntje Straetmaker 1673
- 1744
John Loomis 1622
-1688
Elizbeth Scott 1623
-1696
Sgt Josiah Ellsworth 1629
-1689
Elizabeth Holcombe 1634
-1712
Andrew Bacon 1640
Mary Miller 1640
Samuel Whitmore 1655
-1746
Maria Bacon 1664
-1709
Daniel Stuber 1624
-1693
Barbel Ysch
1625-1672
Jeremias Mann
1640
Appolonia Laumann 1645
Samuel Chubb 1665
Honour Horne 1665
John Derby 1650
-1692
John Conant 1652
- 1724
Bethaih Mansfield 1658
- 1720
Captain Josiah Jones 1643
- 1714
Lydia Treadway 1649
- 1743
Jedediah Strong 1667 -1709
Abijah Ingersoll 1663
-1732
Philip Calverley 1688
Hannah Adams
Timothy Baker 1647
- 1729
Sarah Hollister 1646
- 1691
John Clark 1651
- 1704
Mary Strong 1654
- 1738
Joshua Baker 1642
- 1717
Hannah Tongue (Tonge) 1654
- 1713
Samuel Hurlbut 1644 -1710
Mary Goode 1646
-1735
Isaac Sheldon 1656
-1712
Sarah Warner 1667
-1701
Joshua Brooks 1636
- 1698
Hannah Mason 1636
- 1696
Thomas Blodgett 1661
- 1740
Recebba Todd 1665
- 1740
Thomas Bathrick 1680 -1762
Elizabeth Lynn 1669
-1749
John Knapp
1661 -1773
Sarah Parke 1666
- 1727
Samuel Lyon 1679
- 1756
Joanna Weld 1685
- 1721
Bethiah Conant 1684 - 1774
Johnathan Herrick 1672 - 1724
Bethiah Conant 1684 - 1774
Johnathan Herrick 1672 - 1724
7th Generation 512
Great grandparents
Leendert de Grauw 1601 - 1664
Leuntie Alberts
1610 - 1660
Cornelius Van Hoorn 1625
- 1658
Jannetje Jans 1629 - 1692
David Des Marests 1620
-1695
Maria Sohier 1623
-1681
Simon de Ruine 1615
-1678
Magdalena van de Strat 1620
- 1678
Dirk Volkertszen
1604 - 1677
Christina de la Vigne
1610 - 1663
Jan Dircksen Straatemaack
1642 - 1707
Geesje van Steenway 1646 - 1700
Joseph Loomis 1590 - 1658
Mary White 1590 - 1652
Thomas Scott 1594
- 1643
Elizabeth Strutt 1594
- 1678
Sir John Ellsworth 1578
- 1653
Lady Lucia Bower 1590
- 1633
John Ingersool 1614
- 1684
Abigail Bascom 1640 - 1668
Thomas Halcombe 1601
- 1657
Elizabeth Ferguson 1617
- 1679
Alexander Baker 1604
- 1685
Elizabeth Farrer 1611
- 1685
Henry Brook 1592-
1683
Hannah Cuncliffe 1594
- 1650
Hugh Mason 1605
- 1678
Hester Wells 1611 - 1692
John Knapp 1622
- 1696
Sarah Young
1623 -1696
Joseph Herrick 1645 - 1718
Sarah Leach
Joseph Herrick 1645 - 1718
Sarah Leach
My apologies if there is a set missing from the list, however
if they have a story, it is included in their family lineage.
Our
grandparents double in number through every generation. At some point the
numbers can extend into the millions, especially if a linage can be traced 1000
years or so. Throughout this story, there is a corresponding number against the
particular great grandparent who is being researched. It can get rather difficult
to follow, as very often, there were up to four marriages.
There
will always be one constant - the male lineage, unless of course they decide to
change their name for some reason or other, or in England, when they changed a
name in the medieval times it was to obtain lands often left to their wives.
Occasionally it was for the right to bear arm, or have a Coat of Arms, and to
succeed a dormant Earldom.
All of these people have a story
to tell, sometimes finding those stories was rather difficult, but all attempts
have been made to share their lives with their descendants
Every single one of those great grandparents on all levels was researched, simply to try to establish who the match was with.
Links to the Herrick
Family
The identifiable links between
the Herrick linege and the DeGraw, are many.
But they include the following
family lineages
·
Tarbox
·
Conant
·
Blish
·
Woodbury
·
Derby
·
Skinner
·
Baker
·
Leach
·
Laskin
·
Strong
·
Karner
·
Herrick
To name but a few, of the
families who lived in the period of the mid 1600's.
But one realistic thought, is
that there are thousands and thousands of these descendants all with traces of
the Herrick DNA in their makeup.
Sort of a proverbial "needle in a
haystack", but this just goes to show, that almost anything is possible,
if you are determined enough!
Everyone of the lineages in this
book, are related to the DeGraws. Some
become great uncles, some become great grandparents, or cousins. But they are all part of a very large family
network, and so many has a story to tell.
Throughout
our lives we just take our heritage as a given right. Far too much occupied with the events that
keep us busy on a day to day basis.
But
when the time comes to say "good-bye" to the work colleagues, and to
contemplate all that "free time" that comes from no work, and no
responsibilities.
A
time, to do all the things you couldn't do while you were working.
Then
as the retirement phase really fits in, there becomes a period of great
adjustment.
Just
what does an extremely busy person pre-retirement, do post-retirement.
Thank
goodness for many of us, we begin a totally different journey, and seek answers
to those who have come before us. We
decide to find our ancestors!
Solving some DNA
Riddles
This is
going to take a bit of understanding and hopefully it will be all as clear as
mud!!!
Follow the trail, beginning with
Henry Irvine DeGraw, up one level is his parents, Henry Ernest DeGraw and
Wilhelmina Portrafka. To the right hand
you see up the next level George Emmett DeGraw and Sarah Burr Derby.
Up the next level is William DeGraw and
Lorena Loomis, then above William is Isaac DeGraw and Mehltable Miller.
Special Note - This photo and the
lineage is not correct, but it was at the time of first finding the missing
links.
What hasn't changed is that Sarah
was born a Derby, her brother Chauncy was born a Derby, then the Carner family
are Randy's great aunts and grandparents.
The Derby's are very interwoven. So it was just as easy to leave the
diagram.
Now we are going to follow the
lineage of Sarah Burr Derby. Up one level to Chauncy Derby and Elizabeth
Carner, Then up a level to Jonathan Derby
and Clarissa Baker, then another level up and Captain Derby and Jemima
Skinner. Then up a level to Jemima
Skinner's parents, Ruth Strong and Joseph Skinner. Then up from Captain Derby to John Derby and
Susannah Jones.
Now you
will notice that John Derby also married Rebecca Tarbox.
Now begin with Mary Strong who is the 5th generation. Follow her line, to Experience Strong, who
married Samuel Tarbox. Then to their
daughter Metahible Tarbox who married Johathan Herrick
From Metahible Tarbox and John
Herrick up to Johathan Herrick who married Bethiah Conant, and next is her
sister Deborah Conant who married John Derby.
Now from Jonathan Herrick to Henry Herrick and
above to the right his father Henry Herrick and Emma Laskin his mother. Above is Sir William Herrick, and the Herrick
family from Leicester
So how
accurate was the DNA?
The estimate was 6.3
generations. If we consider Bethiah Conant and her sister, which is technically
where our proven meeting point is, Bethiah married my cousin.
The Conant and the DeGraw merge
on many occasions. In Randy's case this is 6 generations.
From utter bewilderment as to how
was it possible, to amazement and accomplishment that the link was found.
Better still these grandparents
have such a rich history, and have played a huge part in world historical
events, but not been recognised. It is
nice to be able to share them with such a close family member.
Who would have thought?
Comments
Post a Comment